{"id":2795,"date":"2010-07-21T10:08:44","date_gmt":"2010-07-21T10:08:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/2010\/07\/dail_star_tv_ad\/"},"modified":"2010-07-21T10:08:44","modified_gmt":"2010-07-21T10:08:44","slug":"dail_star_tv_ad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/2010\/07\/dail_star_tv_ad\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Star TV Ad Redux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/weblog\/archive\/002902.html\">A few months ago<\/a> I noted that the Daily Star was claiming to be &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most successful newspaper&#8221; in a TV ad. It was basing those findings on the then most recent ABC figures from January 2010, which then showed a small percentage increase in year on year sales results.<br \/>\nThose TV ads are running again according to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/weblog\/archive\/002902.html#comment-3953\">commentor<\/a>.<br \/>\nSince then, proprietor Richard Desmond has cut the price of the paper further to just 10p. Remembering that both newsagent and distributors need to take a cut from that, I would assume that basically none of that cover price is being returned to Express Newspapers. The paper is effectively free.<br \/>\nThe Sun remains discounted in some parts of the country, and the Mirror has remained at 45p. So put that in perspective when looking at these figures.<br \/>\nBut when you do look at the most recent annual figures, the Daily Star has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/table\/2010\/jul\/16\/abcs-national-newspapers\">lost more sales<\/a> than either of its two key rivals.<br \/>\nIf you consider January to June 2010 changes, then the Daily Star has <I>lost<\/I> a smaller percentage of sales than either of its rivals. But if that&#8217;s the source they&#8217;re using then &#8220;Britain&#8217;s least bad over the last six months newspaper&#8221; might be more accurate, or as my commentor says, &#8220;Britain&#8217;s least unsuccessful newspaper.&#8221;<br \/>\nLet&#8217;s remind ourselves of where the Daily Star sits in the ecosystem. Have a look at the most up to date ABC figures:<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/spreadsheets.google.com\/oimg?key=0Atga8N37qziddDV1SlhCeFpaQTN6TkVabF90QVVrbkE&#038;oid=2&#038;zx=fn0rot-glj1y4\" \/><br \/>\n<em>Source: Guardian\/ABC<\/em><br \/>\nIt should also be noted that the Mirror does not include Daily Record sales from its sister publication in Scotland in this instance.<br \/>\nSo can the Daily Star honestly claim to be &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most successful newspaper&#8221;?<br \/>\nAs an aside, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2010\/jul\/21\/channel-five-decision-due-friday\">disturbing reports<\/a> suggest that Star proprietor, and pornographic channel owner, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Desmond\">Richard Desmond<\/a> is in prime position to buy Five. So should we be looking forward to more TV ads with spurious claims, and perhaps a return to late-night Channel 5 fare of old? I know I shan&#8217;t be watching the channel should he get his hands on it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few months ago I noted that the Daily Star was claiming to be &#8220;Britain&#8217;s most successful newspaper&#8221; in a TV ad. It was basing those findings on the then most recent ABC figures from January 2010, which then showed a small percentage increase in year on year sales results. Those TV ads are running [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}