Triggertrap has just published the finished #LapseLondon video:
I’m pleased that a couple of my segments made the cut. Read more about the day and see a behind the scenes video here.
And to see a fuller version of my shots, check out this post.
Last night was the peak of the Geminids meteor shower. So I headed out from the lights of my part of suburbia to rural Bayford (a 10 minute train ride). To be honest, there are still plenty of city lights on the horizon, but it’s the best I can do easily.
I set myself up in a field, and thanks to the red torch of my headlamp, I then spent the thick end of two hours in a field. A fine way to spend a Saturday.
I had two cameras set up, both taking 20-30 second exposures in different parts of the sky. The photo at the top had a wide-angle lens on it, and that photo, which includes Polaris (the pole star) shows the stars leaving circular trails around it. The camera stopped at one point, hence the slight break in every trail. I also learnt that I need something to fight the dew if you stay out that long. I hadn’t noticed that both cameras had fogged up by the end of the evening, leaving me with useless pictures. It appears that a cheap way to fight this is to use chemical hand warmers…
The photo is made up of about 60 images, stacked inside Startrails.
The photos below are a couple of shots of something like 20-25 meteors that I observed in different parts of the sky. Unfortunately, the don’t always appear in the right places, or be to faint to be visible in photographs. Perhaps I just need a faster lens?
Finally, here’s another startrail photo made up of 118 images including parts of some of the images above. I need to persevere with this!
I’ve just updated my WordPress theme to make it responsive.
There may be the odd thing broken around here. If there is, then I apologise. But do feel free to drop me a note if you find anything that seems a bit odd. Hopefully I’ll be able to use some slightly bigger pictures and generally not have that somewhat overbearing header image any more.
We’ll see how things go.
Earlier this week, Global announced that it would soon be launching Heart Extra on national DAB. This is the first of a big DAB push.
They already have Smooth Christmas running on the platform, and that rebrands as Smooth Extra from December 27th. They also have Capital XTRA, LBC and Classic FM all on the same DAB multiplex. The press release also promises “more to come,” although it’s not clear how many more stations “more” means.
Anyway, for Global to add one additional station to the D1 line-up, something has to give. That means one current station has to go to make way for Heart Extra. We know a Global station isn’t going. And Bauer has announced longer term plans for its digital portfolio, including replacing Absolute Radio 90s with Magic.
And we can be certain too that Talksport isn’t going anywhere.
So that leaves three independent services: BFBS, Premier Christian Radio and UCB Christian radio. I believe that at least one of those has to go to make room for Heart.
Furthermore, depending on what kind of bitrate Global wants to run Heart Extra at, they may have to play around with the bitrates of their other stations if they want to broadcast Heart Extra at 80k mono.
For all things bitrate and multiplex related, the go-to site is Wohnort DAB, so I’ve used their reports of the current state of play as a jumping off point.
Here’s a view of what the radio services look like currently, and what they’ll possibly look like in 2015 once Heart Extra is on-air.
|Current Station||Owner||Current Bitrate||Possible Station 2015||Owner||Possible Bitrate|
|Absolute Radio||Bauer||112 kbit/s||Absolute Radio||Bauer||112 kbit/s|
|Absolute 80s||Bauer||64 kbit/s||Absolute 80s||Bauer||64 kbit/s|
|Absolute Radio 90s||Bauer||64 kbit/s||Magic||Bauer||64 kbit/s|
|KISS||Bauer||80 kbit/s||KISS||Bauer||80 kbit/s|
|Planet Rock||Bauer||80 kbit/s||Planet Rock||Bauer||80 kbit/s|
|Capital XTRA||Global||112 kbit/s||Capital XTRA||Global||112/80 kbit/s|
|Classic FM||Global||128 kbit/s||Classic FM||Global||128/112 kbit/s|
|LBC||Global||64 kbit/s||LBC||Global||64 kbit/s|
|Smooth Xmas||Global||80 kbit/s||Smooth Extra||Global||80 kbit/s|
|Heart Extra||Global||80/64 kbit/s|
|talkSPORT||UTV||64 kbit/s||talkSPORT||UTV||64 kbit/s|
|BFBS Radio||BFBS||80 kbit/s||BFBS Radio||BFBS||80 kbit/s|
|Premier Christian Radio||Premier||64 kbit/s||Premier Christian Radio||Premier||64 kbit/s|
|UCB UK Christian||UCB||64 kbit/s||UCB UK Christian||UCB||64 kbit/s|
The three at risk stations are italicised at the bottom of the right hand side of the table.
Furthermore, for Global to launch another DAB service right now, then a second of these stations would need to go as well.
Another thing to consider is the forthcoming “D2″ multiplex. There was a late extension from Ofcom for applications, strongly suggesting that we will see at least two competitive bids by the closing date at the end of January. That said, you may see some of the same services crop up on both bids.
The timetable from the end of January is for Ofcom to look at the applications, fire lots of questions at the applicants and generally put everyone through the mill. Ofcom says that it will announce an award “as soon as practicable thereafter.” I would anticipate an announcement sometime during the summer. In reality, that means the earliest new services could get up and running would be sometime in early 2016, so there’s a while to go before any more new space appears.
What all this means is that if a service gets bumped off Digital One today (or outbid anyway), then it’s going to take them a while to get back onto a national DAB multiplex, because it’ll be another year before more space is available.
It’ll be interesting to see what Global and others do in the meantime.
[Update: 16 December 2014] It’s now official that Premier Christian Radio hasn’t secured an extension to its place on Digital One. Radio Today reports that Premier has a temporary extension allowing them to run from this weekend through Christmas until February. But it’s clear that Premier wants to remain on the multiplex, while Global claims to have “more to come.” Arqiva won’t be complaining then…
Last weekend, Triggertrap, the people who make smart phone adaptors for your DSLR cameras, organised an event called #LapseLondon. About forty of us assembled at their offices for some really interesting talks before heading out into a winter London.
I managed to not follow the right technical instructions with my first shoot on Carnaby Street (hence the slightly staccato appearance). But I managed to take a few sequences in various ways. I’ve no idea if any of these will make it to the final master video, but in the meantime I’m sharing mine!
I missed Guardians of the Galaxy in cinemas earlier this year. But it was well reviewed, and I did plan to catch it.
The good news is that it came out on “home video” recently. So I could either buy it on DVD or BluRay, or watch it in download/streaming.
If I choose to rent it, I have a few options.
I have a largish TV, so HD is my preferred option, and the industry continues to put some kind of quality premium on film rentals. But since I have a smart TV and a number of devices attached to my television, I have a few options as to where I get the film from.
Assuming they’re all much of a muchness with regards to quality, here are my options:
|Amazon Instant Video||£3.49||£4.49|
Huh? Why is Sky £1 more than all my other options?
It’s probably easiest since I tend to default to my Sky box when the TV is on, and Sky ensures that it downloads a healthy buffer so that once I start watching it, I won’t be interrupted by buffering. But I’m not so lazy as to not want to change inputs to either the Amazon or Wuaki apps on my TV, or Google Play via Chromecast on another HDMI port.
Maybe I’ve answered my own question. Of those who own smart TVs, x% (where x is a significant number) don’t use the apps on their smart TVs. And to use Google Play, I do need a Chromecast, albeit a relatively inexpensive device.
I tend to watch streaming services like Netflix or Amazon on my TV. Sure, I have the apps on my phone and tablet. But that big screen dominating one end of my living room, with the surround speakers is best for expensively made Hollywood films. For the most part, I don’t stream to mobile devices (downloads are different, and I might for travel).
And a recent report says that 78% of Netflix subscribers watch (at least some) programming on their TV.
But what I think this all boils down is that it’s laziness that allows Sky to charge another £1 more for their customers than anyone else!
Afterword: I watched the film via Google Play and my Chromecast. It’s not perfect as it’s streaming constantly so there was a buffering moment (and I have fibre). And there were occasional quality drops. So perhaps Sky does have a bit of a good hand to play. On the other hand, I’ve not noticed any discernible issues streaming either on Amazon or Netflix beyond an initial quality check.
* Actually, since I don’t have Apple TV, this would be the most awkward for me, requiring a laptop running iTunes connected to my TV via an HDMI cable. Still I include it for completeness.
** At the time I wrote this, there was something wrong with the Wuaki.tv website and Guardians of the Galaxy had a 404 error. However, were it to be available, it would almost certainly follow the same pricing as listed here because that’s the level at which they price the rest of their films.
Yesterday was a very interesting evening at the Radio Academy’s AGM. Ordinarily this is a rather dry affair formally closing the previous year’s accounts. It usually happens just ahead of a London event – if only to ensure that the meeting is quorate (a favourite word of Academy Chairman Ben Cooper, we learnt).
But last night was somewhat different. As you may well know, the Radio Academy is in something of a state of flux at the moment. Read my previous piece for a bit more on it.
Since then, all four members of the “executive office” have been made redundant, and we’re no closer to really knowing what the future of the Academy is.
James Cridland live-Tweeted last night’s meeting, and he’s cleaned it all up a bit over on his site. It’s well worth reading in full.
In summary, these are the points I would take from the meeting:
It was probably only towards the end of the meeting that we really got to the heart of the matter. There are some serious differences in what some of the big radio groups think the future of the Radio Academy should be. And because the big groups prop up the organisation, they have a lot of implicit control.
In a year when both the Awards and the Festival lost money, that means those groups have a lot of clout. And there’s no agreement between them. The Festival making or losing money is almost completely in the hands of the big boys. If they choose not to send as many representatives to the event, then who do you imagine is going to attend? Certainly times are tough and budgets are tight both commercially and within the BBC. But it can be make or break dependent on who comes. As for the Awards losing money? I’ve still no idea how that happens. Even without a headline sponsor, I’d give the Awards to a private company if that’s the case.
Because there’s been so much consolidation within the radio industry, we’ve ended up in this place, and seems to me that even if we get through this, that makes the organisation’s future untenable. So we’re left with two choices. Either fund the organisation from individual subscriptions (with perhaps small contributions from patrons), or broaden the membership of the group. I can’t see that we can avoid asking other “audio” groups to join a new “Audio Academy.” There is a demarcation of lines – where does radio start and stop any more in an on demand world? That doesn’t mean that there shouldn’t be a set of radio awards – awards given to programmes regardless of delivery mechanism. I look at television and note that Netflix and Amazon get nominations in the US Emmy Awards for example. The delivery mechanism is frankly irrelevant.
And that’s not to say that I don’t believe in a popular linear, mostly live radio listening experience.
But broadening the base would strengthen the industry. And if one group decides it’s not going to fund the organisation, then we have a wider financial backing to rely on. You can’t be held to ransom.
But in the meantime, it does feel like there are two different Radio Academies, and the Trustees aren’t perhaps as aware of the “other” one. There was a lot of talk about the Awards, the Festival, and the Hall of Fame dinner that took place only last week. I know how important it is for radio talent to be commemorated at such events.
But there also needs to be a realisation that the pool of people who can attend big expensive events like that is limited. Furthermore, the people who attend a radio conference are not necessarily the people who attend a radio awards ceremony.
To most members, the Radio Academy means their local/regional regular meetings with talks from people within the industry and events like quiz nights. And that does take some organisation. Someone has to let members know that there are meetings happening in London, Leeds or Glasgow. Someone has to find a venue, probably free of charge (especially hard in London and you’ve got 150 people coming). Someone has to manage numbers and put information on a website.
It’s that resource that the Academy is going to be lacking. There are clearly differences in how various regional branches are run, and that’ll be down to the people involved. London has its own branch committee, but it’s undoubtedly relied upon the resources of the Academy’s office to help out with venues (which need to be sizeable), and administration. Consequently, I completely understand Sandy Warr’s feeling at last night’s meeting that members have been left high and dry.
It does feel that the old Academy has been dismantled before anyone has any clear vision of what the new Academy will look like. And that’s probably the biggest frustration everyone has. We’re left with an interim CEO, Gloria Abramoff who with the best will in the world seems likely to struggle with some of the practical issues surrounding immediate Academy needs. And we’re left in a state of flux where there are clearly massively divergent views on what the Academy should look like, from different Trustees (Cooper was clear that it wasn’t a single outlier view). These need to be surfaced, because it’s clear that we’re not yet in full knowledge of the situation. Are some Trustees unhappy with the Awards which they feel they can’t win in their current guise? And what should the new membership structure look like? Do we move back to more reliance on individual subscriptions rather than “free” with your employer? If it’s the latter, then there needs to be rationale for people paying £25, £50 or £100 per year to be members.
But I’m not completely downbeat.
I think that there’s enough love for the Academy that something will come out the other side. But it’s going to have to change shape substantially. And it’s going to need a broader membership – both in terms of corporate patrons but also in terms of individuals. I still find it annoying that of the many thousands of people who work in radio in London, I see so few at Radio Academy events. Whether that’s a lack of relevance to their lives or a lack of knowledge, I’m not sure. But that’s an area that the Trustees really need to work at, because they all sit in the businesses where these people work, and where they can engage their staff.
As well as photos of the women’s race I also took photos of the men’s race, the weekend before last in Milton Keynes.
Cyclo cross seems to have had something of a resurgence in the UK over the last few years. But then again, so has cycling in general. I’ve been going to the Rapha Supercross races, which are handily close to me, for the last few years (sadly I missed this year’s race).
And I keep looking at “CX” bikes as the next bike I buy (subject to the Rule 12 formula, where the correct number of bikes to own is n+1, where n is the number of bikes I own currently). I don’t think I could hack around the mud non-stop for 45 mins – an hour, but a CX bike might allow me some off-road fun, form the basis of a commuter, and allow panniers for touring (I should also mention that I currently have both a mountain bike for off-roading, and a converted mountain bike for touring).
But I was thinking back to the first time I saw cyclo cross, and I remembered being taken by my father to watch a race at Forty Hall in Enfield back in 1981. I know that it was quite a big race, and the grounds of the house are quite large – with plenty of space to run such a race. Later, the same grounds would be where my school had cross-country runs.
I can’t say I remember a great deal about the day, except that the course went through a stream, which any 11 year old boy thought sounded fun.
A bit of Googling suggests that the race I was watching was this race. It was won by Chris Wreghitt, who was five-times national British Cyclo Cross champion at the time.
I’m not quite sure what the race’s standing was, but I’m pretty certain that it wasn’t the national championship, since the runner-up was Belgian. That also suggests that it had an international field, and placing the race in the south of England made it easier for competitors from cyclo cross’s homeland to and from the site relatively easily.
I also think I saw a young Malcolm Elliott that day – I think I may have collected his autograph! I may be making this up though. I definitely collected someone’s autograph.
Here are some more photos, with plenty more on Flickr.
It’s a bit of a moot question, because the IOC has just voted to launch one at the 127th IOC session taking place today and tomorrow in Monaco.
— IOC MEDIA (@iocmedia) December 8, 2014
The full description of the recommendation was as follows:
“The IOC to launch an Olympic Channel.”
Given that a large part of how the IOC generates revenue is selling TV rights to the Olympic Games, we can be pretty certain that live coverage of the actual summer and winter games is not going to be what this channel does. NBC, for example, has the rights to all the Olympics between now and 2032, paying an astronomical $7.75bn for the privilege.
Leaving aside the serious question of how TV is going to be broadcast in 2032, and whether linear channels with millions of viewers is how we’ll be watching, the scale of that deal makes clear the revenue implications of broadcast.
So you can be certain that an Olympic Channel will do nothing to damage those rights. That means that basically the channel won’t be able to broadcast any actual games’ coverage during the games themselves.
Each edition of the Games lasts for 17 days, just about five weeks in total every four year cycle. That leaves a lot of time when the Olympics aren’t on. And that means many many hours to fill on an Olympic channel.
Assuming that the channel isn’t just going to be filling the airtime with reheated old competitions that are of minimal interest (one off documentaries, yes; continuous re-runs of Atlanta 1996, no), what are they going to fill all that airtime with?
According to The Guardian’s Owen Gibson who is at the session:
Proposed Olympics TV channel – “always on, aggregated platform featuring content from IOC and its key stakeholders". Er, sounds thrilling.
— Owen Gibson (@owen_g) December 8, 2014
Olympics TV channel will also feature "programming for youth highlighting importance of fair play" and "showcase hard and soft legacies"
— Owen Gibson (@owen_g) December 8, 2014
I can’t wait for all of that to be added to my channel supplier. And is this going to be free, or are people going to be expected to pay to watch it?
I suppose the channel could show Olympic sports that don’t get much coverage outside of the Games. Except that some of those sports are pretty popular in some parts of the world – handball for example. And while fencing or modern pentathlon may not bring in big TV revenues anywhere, I’m not certain that they’ll bring in big audiences either.
My fear is that the channel could end up like Sky Sports F1. When the BBC let Sky enter the fray (to save itself some money), Sky threw the kitchen sink at Bernie Ecclestone. It would get a whole channel. Each weekend’s racing would be fully covered live, and with extensive highlights. There’d be lots of options on the red button.
But not even football gets its own channel, and that’s on nearly year round, with many hours of games a week – far more than F1 can offer. F1 has around 19/20 weekends a year, which means the channel has a lot of time to re-air old races, have a few talk shows, but generally fill itself with lots of repeats. And now there are a few months until the start of the next season, there’s really nothing new to show at all. They should have called the channel Sky Sports Motorsport, and included some more events to bulk out the channel offering.
Now if Sky Sports F1 is a bit of a waste of a space on the EPG (original programming could easily sit on the existing five channels, with red button and on demand programming used as and when), I can’t begin to think what a waste of space an Olympics channel might be.
Endless slightly dull interviews with Olympians in their training regimes? A detailed look at how London has evolved Stratford post games? I suspect we won’t be getting the inside story on German TV’s allegations about Russian sport, or looks at the working conditions taking place in potential bid nations (yes – I’m talking about Doha).
It does sound like the IOC is cleaning up its act – certainly when put alongside FIFA. But a channel with nothing of interest to show is just a waste of money.
I couldn’t put a precise tome on it, but at some point in the late summer or early autumn, the battery performance of my Nexus 5 fell off a cliff.
I’m not an unreasonable phone user. My phone tends to get a bit of action on the commute to work, as I listen to some audio – music or podcasts depending on whether I’m reading – and clear through some email. I might check train times, and browse social media.
Once I’m at work, the phone tends to take a back seat, with texts and Twitter alerts making up most of its usage.
The commute home mirrors earlier on, and then it gets used less in the evenings aside from actual phone calls. I have laptops and tablets that are better suited by then.
I never had to use a charger during the day unless I’d been particularly heavy in battery usage – maybe using the phone a lot on a long train journey. But that was about it. The only reason I bought a portable battery charger was for those exceptional days when you know you’ll be hammering the phone a lot and won’t have anywhere to plug in.
But the battery performance of my Nexus 5 has utterly failed in recent weeks. I’d hoped that the rollout of Android 5.0 – Lollipop – would sort it out.
But it hasn’t. It came to the point that I couldn’t leave the house unless I was carrying both a plug-in charger (for work, coffee shops etc), and portable battery charger (for all those other times). Everything caused the power to fail.
Now I realise that battery life is heavily affected by things like the ability to get a signal. If you spend a lot of time in a poor signal area, the phone is expending a lot of power pinging those distant masts. But that’s not really a problem for me either at work or at home.
It all came to a head on Friday when I left work with a fully charged phone, and went to a two-hour film screening at the BFI. My phone was on silent in my pocket – unused of course. When I looked at it afterwards, it was at 47% – in TWO HOURS! Not only that, but the phone was pretty damn hot.
So on Saturday, I bit the bullet, and switched my SIM to a Moto G (4G) that I bought for convoluted Tour de France related reasons earlier in the year. It’s not on Lollipop yet – but that’s reportedly coming soon. The difference is that this phone is easily making it through the day. 40%+ charge left at the end of Saturday and Sunday. As I write this, it’s lunchtime, and it still has 85% charge.
In the meantime, I’m still carrying the Nexus 5 around because it has a work email account on it (which I can still use via WiFi) and various apps that I’m not moved across to the Moto G (which only has 16GB of memory – I’m getting a 32GB micro-SD card later today to sort out that problem).
But here’s the thing. Without a 4G network to worry about, the Nexus 5 is sailing through the day. It’s currently at 94% charged! And it finished both Saturday and Sunday with ~80% left.
I had been thinking about replacing the battery on the Nexus – there are YouTube videos to help you – but it seems to me that it’s not the battery that’s the problem, but the power management of the phone. Maybe there’s a fault with one of the radios? A factory reset might be another option too – I went through that painful procedure previously, and it sorted it out – for a while.
So do I?
a) Reset the Nexus and see if I can sort out the issues? It’s only just over a year old after all.
b) Stick with the Moto G and not worry about shortcomings like lack of NFC (which I do find useful), and a relatively poor camera?
c) Look to a new phone such as the Sony Xperia Z3 Compact which looks to be the best Android phone out there?
Or some combination of the above?
If Sony releases Lollipop as it has promised to do, early in 2015, then I might jump then – especially if prices come down a bit. Although I suspect that their next iteration in the Xperia range will come with the promised new camera sensor might make we wait.
I do like stock Android, and many manufacturers are only making relatively “light” changes to it, while Google’s shift towards putting big changes into apps which are under its control, makes this less of an issue.
Incidentally, I’m not switching to an iPhone for “Apple related reasons,” and I’m not getting a Nexus 6 because last time I bought a pair of gloves, my hands were size “Large” rather than XXXL.