YouTube Bigger Than MySpace – But Both Full Of Copyright Material?

Today’s Media Guardian reports how Alexa is now showing YouTube as having overtaken MySpace (note to self: when you create your Web 2.0, or even 3.0, company, ensure that it’s two words with no space and two capitals – it’s the law).
I’m sure it’s fantastic news for YouTube, a bit like the way that Murdoch’s doing well out of MySpace. But both sites, in my view, have some serious questions that need answering in the world of copyright before they can be fully monetised.
I’ve been through the arguments about YouTube before, and a Napster-style takedown has got to happen at some point, sadly. MySpace is a little more confusing, but it too is full of copyright music. A lot of it is new music that bands and artists have put up there themselves, and that’s great. But what about all the copyright material that anyone can put up themselves? Even if I can only stream and not download the track, that still has to be paid for.
For example, I note today that even Media Guardian’s “Monkey” has got himself a website there in honour of Murdoch’s conference in Pebble Beech, at which Tony Blair felt it was somehow necessary to give a speech. Maybe he can come and give a talk at our company? We’re not even that far from Downing Street. We could arrange it in the lunch hour.
But back to the Media Monkey MySpace site. When you go on it, you’re regaled with Hey Hey, We’re The Monkeys, by the eponymous group. Very funny. And the hideous design is true of many MySpace sites, it’s as if nobody’s moved on from the early days of GeoCities.
I would like to know where along the way, The Monkees songwriters and performers get their cut?
Questions, questions, questions.


Posted

in

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “YouTube Bigger Than MySpace – But Both Full Of Copyright Material?”

  1. chris avatar
    chris

    I wonder if its is perhaps copyright law that is going to have to change to take account of YouTube and MySpace more than the other way round.

  2. Adam Bowie avatar

    Perhaps.
    Copyright law has only changed for the worse in the last forty years, with extensions added on to keep things in copyright. But the British music industry is busily campaigning for extensions to the copyright in sound recordings at the moment – with the first Beatles material coming out of copyright in 2013. They want it extended from 50 years to 95!
    Sadly I can only see the rules being tightened rather than weakened.
    Of course, a decent licencing system that lets YouTube or MySpace pay, say, a percentage of their profits to the various bodies might simplify things. But different countries in the world have different rules. And I can get to YouTube from anywhere (well, perhaps not China). So which body does my funky new Web 2.0 social network site pay?
    Copyright law is where the money is right now.